Pages

Friday 26 November 2010

Police attack students involved in nationwide protests in UK

Tens of thousands of university and college students, as well as school-aged youth demonstrated across the UK on Wednesday, in opposition to higher tuition fees and cuts in further and higher education.

A protest of around 10,000 was held in London and marches and demonstrations were held in many other towns and cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Oxford, Cambridge, Leeds, Sheffield, Newcastle, Bournemouth, Glasgow and Cardiff.
Many attending the demonstrations were further education students and sixth-formers between 16 and 18 years old. School pupils, many still in uniform, also walked out of lessons in support of demonstrations in London, Manchester, Sheffield, Winchester, Cambridge and Leeds. Among the issues this age group were protesting are government plans to remove the Education Maintenance Allowance, which provides low-income students with up to £30 a week to help with the costs of staying in full-time education after leaving school at 16.
Wednesday’s protest events were organised largely on an ad hoc basis by local organisations that have sprung up in opposition to the government’s attacks on education. This was evidenced by the proliferation of homemade banners and placards. The protests were a clear manifestation of the indignation felt by young people and students to the National Union of Students, the University and College Union as well as the opposition Labour Party, who had openly sided with the government in condemning student protesters in London two weeks ago and have organised nothing since then.
In London protesters gathered in Trafalgar Square at midday, before setting off for Whitehall, the administrative centre of the British government. The march should have been a fairly straight-forward event that would have passed without incident. However, the police wanted to make an example of protesters against austerity and cuts in line with the state-orchestrated witch-hunt following the protests by university students in London two weeks ago.
To this end, the Metropolitan Police utilised Wednesday’s demo in order to carry out a massive operation against mainly school-aged young people and to make a show of strength. During the last decade the police have dealt with many larger marches and events, particularly those against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Ahead of the London demonstration, former Met commissioner Brian Paddick said the police would “throw the kitchen sink” at the protest. The Met mobilised 1,500 officers to control the London protest--seven times as many as were present two weeks ago. These included the Territorial Support Group, the Met’s riot police.
Wednesday marked the return to the now notorious strategy of “kettling” that was heavily criticised last year at the anti-G20 demonstrations. Kettling is when police surround and pen in thousands of protesters in small areas for hours on end without access to food, drink or toilet facilities. It amounts to the forced imprisonment of demonstrators without due legal process. As a result of these actions during the G20 protests, Ian Tomlinson, a newspaper vendor making his way home from work, was killed by police brutality.
The demonstration was halted by police on Whitehall, before it was able to reach Parliament Square. The road leading to the headquarters of the Liberal Democrats was also sealed off. Marchers had planned to protest there as Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg had promised prior to the general election that the Lib-Dems would vote against any rise in tuition fees. Even before taking office in partnership with the Conservatives, this policy had been abandoned in private--with the Liberals agreeing to support a hike that could see fees triple to £9,000 a year.
Demonstrators attempting to move out of the locked-down areas that had been cordoned off in Whitehall were then attacked with truncheons. After 6pm the police finally allowed about 1,000 demonstrators to leave the kettled area. Further violence then took place, as mounted police charged protesters who had gathered near Trafalgar Square. Some protestors, including schoolchildren were reportedly still being detained under what amounts to street arrest at midnight.
The Met said they made 29 arrests in the capital. The BBC reported that 11 “members of the public” were injured.
The demonstration took place on a day when temperatures plummeted to near freezing. The right-wing Daily Mail reported how, “Some schoolchildren were seen ripping pages from their schoolbooks to burn while others did their homework, complaining that they were cold, tired and hungry.”
The kettling of protesters for hours under these conditions endangered the safety and wellbeing of those involved, a fact the police were well aware of when they commenced the operation on Whitehall. Speaking to Sky News, Graham Wettone, a former Met Police public order intelligence officer, said, “It’s been a successful operation. It’s very warm when you are jumping up and down, but when you are standing still it gets cold very quickly.”
The Met’s Forward Intelligence Teams also took photos of students before and while they had been kettled in Whitehall.
Incidents of police brutality also took place in other cities including Manchester, where a large police presence attacked protesters, including charges by mounted officers. A sit-in on Oxford Road led to protesters being forcibly removed. One student told the Guardian, “Clashes were frequent. I saw several girls have their hair pulled by police, and an ITV journalist was pushed around by police after taking pictures.
“After this, we had a spontaneous march down Oxford Road. The police then blocked off the road near Rusholme, charged the protesters and threatened to arrest anyone who went on the roads.
“A lot of people seemed to be arrested over the course of this evening protest, and traffic on Oxford Road must have been stopped for hours.”
Over the past weeks, the media has largely been in lock-step with the government in condemning the relatively minor instances of vandalism and trespass that occurred in London two weeks ago. This continued unabated throughout the day on Wednesday, with the state broadcaster, the British Broadcasting Corporation, virtually assuming the role of the Ministry for Propaganda. The BBC covered the London protest with a live feed and took every opportunity to praise the police operation and vilify those demonstrating.
During a report given by “Look East’s” Anna Todd, commenting on students jumping over railings in an attempt to join a sit-down protest taking place at the University of Cambridge’s Senate House, she referred to “the rabble” that were involved.
The portrayal of student protesters as violent hooligans and extremists is being routinely employed in order to criminalise any serious manifestation of dissent and opposition to the government’s brutal austerity measures. Even as the protests were taking place Wednesday, education secretary Michael Gove demanded the “full force of the criminal law” be applied against protesters in London.
Gove declared that “It would send completely the wrong message if the government ... if we abandoned that policy because of violence. I respond to arguments, I do not respond to violence.”
He said protesters should be denied the “oxygen of publicity” by the media. This was a phrase used by Conservative prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1985, referring to the IRA who she denounced as “terrorists and hijackers”.
The protests by students and school pupils are continuing, with at least 10 universities and colleges occupied overnight Wednesday. These include Oxford University’s Bodleian Library, the University of Leeds Student Union, and the Aston Webb building at the University of Birmingham. Royal Holloway, Plymouth, Warwick, London South Bank, UCL, Essex and UWE Bristol, Glasgow, Strathclyde and Dundee Universities. These followed occupations at the School of Oriental and African Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University and University of the West of England that began in the days leading up to Wednesday’s demonstrations. (WSWS)


Home          Sri Lanka Think Tank-UK (Main Link)

Students demonstrate in UK against increased fees and education cuts

On Wednesday (24/11/10) thousands of students, sixth formers and school pupils demonstrated throughout the UK to protest the governments’ education cuts. Teams from the International Students for Social Equality and the Socialist Equality Party spoke to some of those taking part.

More than 4,000 students from the University of Leeds and Leeds Metropolitan University marched into Leeds city centre. There was a very strong police presence all along the route, with eight video filming vans, other police video teams on roof tops, at least 10 police dogs and six mounted police as well as hundreds of police on foot.
As they marched through the city, office workers gathered round the windows and cheered them as they passed.
Demonstrators protest outside Leeds Town HallDemonstrators protest outside Leeds Town Hall
The demonstrators were met on the steps of the Leeds Art Gallery by up to 1,000 school and further education college students, who had walked out of classes in support of the campaign.
School students from Allerton Grange Comprehensive School had marched five miles into the city centre to attend the rally. On their way they had picked up fellow students from Roundhay Comprehensive. As they passed the Leeds College of Building and Thomas Danby College, students came out to greet them.
AlexAlex
Alex from Allerton Grange School toldWorld Socialist Web Site reporters, “These cuts affect school students, not just in the future but right now. The loss of the Education Maintenance Grant (EMA) of £30-a-week for school students is outrageous. The increase of university fees to £9,000 means that the dream of higher education is being taken away from millions of youth, especially from poor families. My mum is very worried about the situation. We are fighting for our future.”
Seyamak, also from Allerton Grange, said, “I think that education is a right. We are the students of the future. I don’t see that you can set a price on education in a civilised society. Education is a class issue. Bailing out the banks should not come at the top of the agenda. If you take away the right to education, what are you left with?”
Students from Ilkley Grammar SchoolStudents from Ilkley Grammar School
Students attended from Ilkley Grammar School, travelling 15 miles to get there. They had not known anything about the day of action until their parents received letters through the post from their headmaster warning them of the event and saying they could not take responsibility for what happened to the students if they walked out of school.
One of the pupils explained that in their school staff members had been posted at all the exits. They simply waited until the teachers had gone to their classes and then walked out.
Chris, a guitar student from Leeds Music College, said, “These attacks are international. They are happening everywhere. Cultural activities will be one of the hardest hit areas. According to the government, society cannot afford culture. But everybody has the right to cultural expression, in music and every other form. People need culture.”
Dave, a master’s student at Edge Hill University in Ormskirk, said, “This is not so much about my future because my education has been paid for. I’m here because it’s a fundamental right that you have free education. My parents could maybe have afforded these rises, but a lot or ordinary people can’t. That is why I’m here. It’s the next generation. It’s my kids and everyone else’s kids that are going to feel it.”
Gayle, an unemployed worker who supported the students, had been a domestic worker at Boddington student hall of residence and had been made redundant on September 30. She said, “Loads of other cleaners at the university were sacked in July. I have since tried to get another job but can’t get one anywhere.”
Her daughter is a 20-year-old student who is presently in further education. She is not living at home and is sleeping at various friends or relations. Gayle said, “She is suffering badly. She is entitled to nothing except the £30-a-week EMA and when the government stops that she will literally be penniless. She has to provide for food, clothing, and all the necessaries and yet despite everything she is still managing to go to college. She wants to study Law and Criminology and has a place at Leeds Metropolitan University. But who knows what is going to happen? All governments now are not helping anyone. Even if Labour was in she would get nothing.”
Another protester at the rally said, “University education should be free for all who want to seek it. Putting up the fees even further will discourage millions from poorer backgrounds. I qualified in 2008. I had to pay £1,200 a year fees, plus a £3,000 repayable loan and now I am burdened with debt. In future students will have to pay almost the same amount towards one year’s fees.”
D Natasha (right) and her friends Natasha (right) and her friends
Natasha from Lawnswood High School said, “If they cut EMA and raise the entrance fees we won’t be able to afford university. And even if we go to university, we will come out with bills of £80,000 and more. The future will be McDonalds if we don’t get into university.”
One of her friends said, “We have to think about when our generation is the working generation, who is going to pay the taxes for the people that are retiring?”
Another said, “They are cutting EMA and they are cutting arts and sports programmes, but they are not cutting the Ministry of Defence and nuclear weapons which is ridiculous. They need to get their priorities sorted out.”
Before the march into the centre of Leeds began, Barbara Slaughter, a veteran Trotskyist who spent most of her working life as a teacher in Leeds, addressed the students. When she introduced herself as a representative of the World Socialist Web Site, the organisers of the demonstration switched off the microphone, saying “This is a non-political march. We don’t want anything to do with politics. You are not allowed to raise left-wing ideas on this march.”
They were forced to allow Slaughter to speak, with one student hearing the altercation leaning over and switching the microphone back on. In her remarks she drew attention to the leaflet being distributed by supporters of the International Students for Social Equality, warning that the police were using the events at Millbank Towers last week to whip up an atmosphere of hysteria to justify the use of brutal police tactics against future demonstrations of both students and the working class.
She said, “Under conditions where nowhere in the world do working people have a political party that represents their class interests, what is required is the building of an independent party of the working class.”
In Manchester around 5,000 protesters, including students from the University of Manchester, Manchester Metropolitan University, as well as hundreds of pupils from schools in the city and the wider region, marched from the main university area into the city centre. A group of sixth form students came to Manchester from Kendal in Cumbria, 76 miles away.
The ISSE statement was the only leaflet being given out on the demonstration and one student volunteered to take leaflets to distribute.
The march was met by a heavy police presence, which attempted to divert it away from the Town Hall.
Owen, a sixth form college student, said he felt none of the main parties would oppose the cuts, “which are denying education to the poorest in society”. He agreed with uniting the struggles by all sections of workers, “as they are all connected.”
Another student in a group from Trafford College said, “I have worked hard all through school and at college and I don't think I will ever go to university. I think it will all be for nothing.”
She pointed out the growing unemployment among these who were well qualified and experienced and asked, “What chance have we got?” (WSWS)

Home            Sri Lanka Think Tank-UK (Main Link)

Wednesday 24 November 2010

Challenging Racism and Islamophobia


NATIONAL CONFERENCE 
Saturday 11 December
10am–6pm
Mary Ward House
5/7 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SN
Ken Livingstone
Chair, One Society Many Cultures
Doreen Lawrence OBE
Shabana Mahmood
Shadow Home Office Minister
Jean Lambert MEP
Green Party
Claude Moraes MEP
Labour Party
Lisa Nandy MP
Labour Party
Jack Dromey MP
Labour Party
Hywel Williams MP
Plaid Cymru
Talha Jamil Ahmad
Muslim Council of Britain
Anas Altikriti
Spokesperson, British Muslim Initiative
Sir Geoffrey Bindman
Christine Blower
General Secretary, National Union of Teachers
Kay Carberry
Assistant General Secretary, TUC
Rt.Rev Stephen Cottrell
The Bishop of Chelmsford
Dr. Edie Friedman
Executive Director, Jewish Council for Racial Equality
Dr. Jonathan Githens-Mazer
Co-Director, European Muslim Research Centre (EMRC)
Billy Hayes
General Secretary, Communication Workers Union
Bruce Kent
Vice President, Pax Christi
Peter Oborne
Daily Telegraph’s chief political commentator
Martin Smith
Love Music Hate Racism
Salma YaqoobLeader, Respect Party 
London Citizens
Conference themes include:
• Opposing all forms of racism and prejudice
• Celebrating diversity
• Challenging rising Islamophobia
• Stop the growth of the British National Party and the English Defence League
• Defending freedom of thought, conscience, religious and cultural expression
Register your place online today here
Organisation delegates £20
Individuals £10 (waged) £5 (unwaged)
FREE PLACES FOR THE FIRST 100 STUDENTS —
email to register your free student place


To register, reply to this email and include your name, address, email and number of places.
Organised by One Society Many Cultures and supported by:

Register your place: here

More details from: here

Home           Sri Lanka Think Tank-UK (Main Link)

Sunday 14 November 2010

Forthcoming course - History of the Ottoman, Saturday 18th December, London




Islamic Circles presents:

THE ISLAMIC HISTORY OF THE OTTOMANS

by Dr. Salim Ayduz (Fatih University)*

Date: Saturday 18th December 2010
Time: 9am – 5pm [8.30am registration]
Venue: Birkbeck College, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX

DEADLINE: MONDAY 13TH DECEMBER 2010 after which prices increase

The Prophet Muhammad (saw) said: "Verily you shall conquer Constantinople.
What a wonderful leader its leader shall be,and what a wonderful army that
army will be!" (Musnad Ahmad)

To fulfil the prophecy, many Sahabas tried such as Abu Ayub al Ansari and
Muawiyah (ra), followed by various Caliphs such as Abdul Malik, Harun
al-Rashid but they all failed to capture the city.

'Just as there is a single sun in the sky, so too there should be a single
state and a single religion in the world'
- Sultan Muhammed Al Fatih (rh) Conqueror of Istanbul

Speaking up to 8 languages (including Turkish, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, Persian,
French, Latin and Serbian), staunch follower of the Sunnah and spurred by
his teacher Shaykh Shamsuddin, Sultan Fatih conquered Constantinople (Istanbul)
at the age of 21.

Spanning three continents over a period of six centuries, the Ottoman Caliphate
was one the longest lasting empires in history. This short, intensive course
aims to cover the following:

- Rise and Fall of the Ottomans
- Conquest of Constantinople in 1453
- The Great Sultans
- Political, Social and Administrative Structure
- Culture and Art
- Relationship between various Muslim states and other nations

*Dr. Salim Ayduz is originally from Turkey. He graduated from Istanbul University
specializing in the Ottomans. He has taught at various universities such as Fatih
University in Istanbul and is a visitor scholar at Manchester University. His specialization
include Ottoman Archival documents on Ottoman Imperial Arsenal (Tophane-i Amire) and
has published many scholarly articles at international symposiums. Currently, he is a Senior
Researcher at the Foundation for Science, Technology and Civilisation (FSTC) and
contributed to the “1001 Inventions: Discover the Muslim Heritage in our world” both
the book and with exhibitions around the world.

The courses are open to all but spaces are limited. Entry is through prior registration only.
Prayer facilities available and coffee/tea provided during break sessions

Cost (excluding lunch but slide notes provided)
£20 PAID ONLINE by deadline - Monday 13th December and thereafter £30 online or cash on the day
To BOOK please email us the following and once received payment instructions will be sent immediately:Name of main person booking:
Mobile:
City / Town:
No of tickets (including yourself): 


For bookings and further information please contact:
Tel: 07956 983 609
E-mail: info@islamiccourses.org
Website: www.islamiccourses.org

Wassalaam 'alaikum wa rahmatullaah.

Islamic Circles

Monday 8 November 2010

Aggressive secularism or a new role for religion

Britain’s secular liberal establishment appears horrified by the Pope’s comments, and those of his advisor Cardinal Walter Kasper, about Britain’s secular society. The Pope said in his opening speech in the UK “Today, the United Kingdom strives to be a modern and multicultural society…In this challenging enterprise, may it always maintain its respect for those traditional values and cultural expressions that more aggressive forms of secularism no longer value or even tolerate.”


Cardinal Kasper wrote on the eve of the Pope’s visit that “an aggressive new atheism has spread through Britain. If, for example, you wear a cross on British Airways, you are discriminated against.”



This trend has emerged strongly since 9/11 and led to a magnificent double standard. A letter in the Guardian on 15th September 2010 signed by secular evangelists such as Stephen Fry, Professor Richard Dawkins, Professor AC Grayling, Lord Avebury, and Peter Tatchell amongst others denounced the invitation of a state visit for the Pope and included in their reasoning the Pope’s illiberal views. It would be hard to find a letter with the same spectrum of signatories opposing the visits and hospitality shared between British governments and dictators across the world who actively torture and repress their own people.

In Britain, Europe and the United States secular liberal states are proving ever more their intolerance of people of all faiths – frequently ridiculing and demeaning adherents of religions – but most especially Islam.
 Anyone who has witnessed calls for bans on hijabs and niqabs across Europe, as well as minarets; protests against mosques by right wing groups in Britain and even a call to ban the Quran in Holland will recognise an aggressive, unpleasant, even supremacist secular liberalism.



A new role for religion



Aggressive secularism stems from ignorance, fear and dogmatism. Over two centuries after the enlightenment, secular free market liberalism dominates in just about every important nation, yet the secular agenda seems to have stalled. Cynicism has surged. The sense of a strong society is diminishing. And when people are asked about how happy they are, the negativity is electric.



Yet, despite unprecedented prosperity and mass education, it is religion that is today providing a more confident, global and ethical vision, finding traction among all peoples, irrespective of race, colour, sex, age or geography. For supporters of a movement that is supposed to have lost the battle of ideas, religionists have been proving the soothsayers wrong. Why is this?



Firstly, more religious people are now questioning why their values should be suppressed within the public arena. History has taught us that some of the greatest social advancements were made by people motivated by their religious beliefs. The provision of economic and political rights for women in Islamic countries in the seventh century, the abolition of slavery in the UK, civil rights in America: all were done by people with impeccable religious credentials.



If some secularists had had their way, the activism of our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and the campaigning of William Wilberforce or Martin Luther King would be whitewashed from history.



Secondly, despite historical attempts to generalise, many are now rejecting the absurd claim that religion stifles intellectual inquiry. We often hear dire warnings from western capitals about the dangers of the re-emergence of an Islamic caliphate. Yet it is almost undisputed that in its heyday, the caliphate was at the forefront of scientific advancement and community cohesion (contradicting the myth that religious-based systems oppress other faiths).



Thirdly, many are attracted to religion in the West because of what they see as an emerging social malaise and spiritual void. For them, modern society should aspire to be about more than GDP and rabid individualism. This has motivated many to articulate fresh ideas about work-life balance, racism, poverty alleviation and a more just foreign policy.

Lastly, people are rejecting the stale choice of religious fundamentalism versus intolerance. The debate is now centred on competing visions as to how best to achieve the universal ends of prosperity, security and education. But some liberal fundamentalists prefer to use secular society as an overarching ideology to marginalise any kind of religious influence.

Perhaps now is the time for everyone to formulate new paradigms, rather than to fight old culture wars.

For real answers and a real alternative, people need to look at what Islam offers. (HTB)



See also:

Democracy in Crisis

The Global Financial Crisis



Home

Tuesday 2 November 2010

More assimilation, more increase in Muslim prison population


A few years ago, a colleague and I met a journalist who had just returned from living in the Middle East and who was quite amazed at the hysterical media reporting about Muslims in the UK. They wanted to understand the issues affecting the Muslim community. “Why is there a higher proportion of Muslims in prison compared to the number of Muslims in the wider UK population?” they asked. That got me thinking. Indeed, why are Muslims 3% of the UK population but 11% of the UK prison population?
I was reminded of that conversation recently as last week’s newspapers reported three horrific crimes committed by some Muslims. A Muslim boy repeatedly stabbed and murdered his former girlfriend after she had broken up their relationship. Another befriended two well-to-do pensioners then murdered them because he wanted to steal their money to pay off his debts and in another horrific case two young boys murdered a shop keeper as they stole sweets, cash, cigarettes and alcohol. Subhanallah!
What values lead these Muslims to commit such horrendous crimes? What will happen if more Muslims assimilate and embrace some of the Western values that David Cameron, Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and others continuously lecture us about?
Since 1993, the number of Muslim prisoners has risen threefold and Muslim prisoners constitute an increasing proportion of the prison population. The sad reality is that like many in the wider population, most Muslims end up in jail because of involvement in petty crimes, drugs, alcohol and violent offences. How did our community get here?
Parents were law abiding citizens
The first generation of Muslims who arrived in the West in the 1950s and 60s came with Islamic views and practices different to those in the society. An example is the Islamic believe in marriage as the only valid framework for intimate relationships between men and women, as opposed to cohabitation or having boyfriends and girlfriends.
They also came with Islamic values including a belief in abiding by the Creator’s commands in our daily lives as opposed to the wider society’s ‘freedom’ to live as you like. Muslims believe in accountability to the All Aware Creator and that when if commits a crime, even if they are not caught or punished in this life, there is no evading accountability by the Creator in the next life.
“Verily, the most honourable of you with Allah is that believer who has At-Taqwa  [consciousness of Allah]. Verily, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Aware” [TMQ Surah 49:13]
This idea forms a powerful deterrent against vile, unruly and violent behaviour and that is why many of the first generation of Muslims turned out to be amongst the most respectful and law-abiding members of society.
Western values and crime
As their children grew up with a constant diet of ‘freedom’ and ‘life is about what makes you happy’, it was inevitable that some forgot this concept of accountability to Allah (swt) and simply sought material pleasures at any cost. After all, a popular mantra in the west says ‘you only live once, enjoy life to the max’. So we started to witness an increase in the number of Muslims committing the type of crimes prevalent in the wider society. In terms of values, these Muslims have embraced the culture of freedom, disrespect for elders and authority, and licentiousness which are some of the prevalent values in the West.
More assimilation, more problems
As a more aggressive assimilation agenda sweeps across Europe, more and more strident voices are demanding that Muslims must embrace western values. Muslims should challenge these voices by highlighting the consequences of some of these values in the wider society. Neglect of the elderly, the degrading objectification of women for profit, high levels of crime and reoffending, and increasing drug and alcohol abuse by ever younger children are just a few effects of the freedom, licentiousness and ‘do whatever makes you happy’ culture that even some in the West are starting to question.
So the more Muslims succumb to this intimidation and demands to give up some of our Islamic beliefs in order to be accepted, the more we will see Muslim families being afflicted by the same problems that are prevalent in society. The more we let go of our values of modesty, abiding by Allah’s (swt) shariah, respect for elders, accountability to Allah (swt) and other Islamic concepts, the more we will see some Muslims involvement in committing heinous crimes against other members of society and a consequent contribution to the ever rising prison population.
In a recent report, Anne Owers the Chief Inspector of prisons wrote that “Many Muslim prisoners also stressed the positive and rehabilitative role that Islam played in their lives, and the calm that religious observance could induce in a stressed prison environment”. So for some in prison, it is actually a discovery of Islam that helps them to start living a crime free life which is why 30% of the Muslim inmates are said to be converts.
As ambassadors of Islam, we Muslims need to stand for Islam, stand by our noble Islamic values, teach them to our children, reinforce them in our Mosques, madrasas, schools and other institutions and discuss them with the wider society, especially when some demand  that we leave them. One result will be that non-Muslim teachers and the elderly will marvel at the respect afforded them by Muslim students and youngsters who embody these values, Muslim families will be seen as strong, loving and united, and Muslims will end up being under represented in the prison population. And we should also be at the forefront of challenging those western values which are wrecking havoc with the lives of people in the west and in the east. (HTB)